Selected type: Hardcover. Added to Your Shopping Cart. This is a dummy description. Up-to-date coverage on the assessment and treatment of eating disorders and obesity Featuring contributions from an international group of experts, the Handbook of Eating Disorders and Obesity is a broad-based resource that explores the major classifications of eating disorders: anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder. This groundbreaking reference also offers a thorough review of the area of obesity, along with a specialized focus on body image disturbances, including body dysmorphic disorder.
This comprehensive handbook presents the latest information in multiple areas of research and practice, highlighting risk factors, assessment, treatment, and prevention of eating disorders and obesity. Practical guidelines for implementing treatment strategies are supplemented with insightful clinical case studies and helpful explanations illustrating real-world applications of treatment components. The chapters represent a rich synthesis of the wide-ranging psychosocial and biological investigations of obesity and eating disorders, and the equally diverse approaches to their clinical management.
Handbook of Eating Disorders and Obesity | Psychology | Subjects | Wiley
The explicit integration of current research with current clinical practice makes this volume stand out and will ensure its place as an indispensable resource for both those wishing to get up to speed and for established researchers and clinicians alike. About the Author J. Permissions Request permission to reuse content from this site. Table of contents Preface.
- Body Image, Eating Disorders, and Obesity: An Integrative Guide for Assessment | Trade Me;
- Handbook of Eating Disorders and Obesity.
- Body Image and Body Dysmorphic Disorder.
- Publications by Fran Weiss, LCSW-R, BCD, DCSW, CGP, Manhattan-based psychotherapist.
- Download Product Flyer?
PART I. Chapter 1. Chapter 3. Chapter 4. A final assessment of the models can be made in terms of the extent to which the present model would generalize.
Body Image Eating Disorders & Obesity An Integrative Guide For Assessment
There are no recommended values associated with the ECVl, but as a measure of discrepancy, we prefer a model with the smaller value. As with the other measures of fit, the ECVI prefers competing model 2. Figure 2. Covariance structure modeling analysis of hypothesized relationships among variables. All paths significant, with exception of. Body Image 49 Nested Model Comparisons An advantage of the way the models are specified is that the base model is nested within the two competing models and competing model 1 is nested within competing model 2. This allows for a chi-square difference test to be employed to determine if statistically the addition of parameters leads to a significant improvement in the overall model fit.
This is seen as a significant reduction in the overall chi square, as well as the other measures of overall fit. This study extends these correlational findings via the use of CSM and supports the central role of appearance-based comparisons as a mediational link between social feedback teasing , body image, and eating disturbance. Also, in a replication of our earlier work Thompson, Coovert, et al. Maturational timing was not a significant predictor of comparison.
The competing model with the added path from maturational timing to eating disturbance did not fit the data as well as the second competing model teasing to body image , although the path was significant. These results add to the list of conflicting findings in this area Thompson, However, one must use caution before eliminating this variable as an important risk factor. In the current study, adults recalled developmental milestones related to menarche and pubertal timing in comparison to peers.
- Clinical Disorders of Membrane Transport Processes.
- Knee Arthroscopy: A Medical Dictionary, Bibliography, And Annotated Research Guide To Internet References.
- Reiki Shamanism: A Guide to Out-of-Body Healing.
However, many of the supportive studies have been conducted on adolescents who rated levels of physical development or noted age at menarche in a time frame much closer to the actual experience of puberty Graber et al. However, the limited role played by maturational timing in the current study replicates our earlier finding with adolescents, also using CSM Thompson, Coovert, et al. Clearly, maturational timing is an important conceptual variable and further investigation is warranted before any final statement can be made regarding its utility in explaining body image and eating disturbance.
The current model is limited in several ways that should be addressed in future re- search. First, the measurement of self-esteem needs to be broadened to include other indicators. At first glance, it may seem odd that the BIATQ—an indicator of body image— is also an indicator of self-esteem.
However, a wealth of research has documented the strong connection between body satisfaction and overall self-esteem Thompson, An examination of two of the items on this scale reveals how this measure may have also tapped into an overall self-evaluative component e. Second, certainly we have not modeled all of the influential factors that lead to body image dysphoria and eating disturbance. Levine and Smolak have also noted the contextual role that media images play in the possible onset of dysfunctional eating. Heinberg et al. Recent studies with this measure have replicated Stice et al.
The current findings support the use of clinical techniques for the treatment of body image dysphoria that have recently received empirical validation. For instance, Cash , and Rosen have developed body image treatment programs which address multiple aspects of body dissatisfaction via a variety of treatment strategies, including psychoeducational information, in vivo exposure, and cognitive restructuring.
Because of its implications for such interventions for body image dysphoria, future prospective and structural modeling investigations need to fur- ther evaluate the mediational role of social processes such as appearance-based compari- son and internalization of societally-based images of beauty and attractiveness.
Measures of quality of life, subjective well-being, and satisfaction with life. Allison Ed. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. Bentler, P. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, , — Browne, M. Unpublished technical report, Columbus, Ohio. Cash, T. What do you see when you look in the mirror?
New York: Bantam Books. The treatment of body image disturbances. Thompson Ed. Paper presented at the Southeastern Psychological Association, Atlanta. Cattarin, J. A three year longitudinal study of body image and eating disturbance in adolescent females. Cudeck, R. Cross validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, — Cusumano, D. Body image and body shape ideals in magazines: Exposure, awareness, and internalization. Sex Roles, 37, — Festinger, L.
A theory of social comparison. Human Relations, 7, — Garner, D. Eating Disorders Inventory Professional manual. Graber, J. Prediction of eating problems: An 8-year study of adolescent girls.
Developmental Psychology, 30, — Heinberg, L. Theories of body image disturbance: Perceptual, developmental, and sociocultural factors. Social comparison: Gender, target, importance ratings and relation to body image disturbance. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, — Body image and televised images of thinness and attractiveness: A controlled laboratory investigation.
Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14, — International Journal of Eating Disorders, 17, 81— Start by pressing the button below! However, researchers and clinicians did not immediately build on her suggestion by targeting the body image problem Kevin Thompson. However, researchers and clinicians did not immediately build on her suggestion by targeting the body image problems of individuals with eating disorders.
See a Problem?
In , Garner, Fairburn, and Davis cataloged 22 different treatment components in the 19 treatment outcome studies contained in their review. None of these intervention strategies included a focus on body image issues. In his review, Rosen found that the "overwhelming majority" p. None of the 20 pharmacological studies measured body image see chapter 14, this volume, for an update on this literature. Of the 40 psychological treatment outcome studies reviewed by Rosen , approximately one third involved some procedure to modify body image. Many of these trials were uncontrolled, with the exception of several studies with bulimia nervosa.
Of the few controlled studies, cognitive-behavioral procedures appeared to offer the most promise for improving body image concerns. Rosen concluded that it was "ironic and alarming that there is still no definite answer to questions of treatment effectiveness for body-image disturbance" p. Rosen in press recently revisited this issue. His second review of this area included studies that employed an experimental design with random assignment of subjects to treatment and, minimally, one other condition.
If studies did not contain specific details delineating procedures targeting body image concerns, they were not labeled as including a body image therapeutic component.